History professor Aleksandar Atanasovski from the UKIM university in Skopje, whose area of expertise is the Middle Ages, including the Byzantine era and the Empire of Tsar Samuil – was a guest on a Bulgaria radio show discussing the recent movement of his purpoted sarcophagus from Solun to Sofia. In the interview, professor Atanasovski discussed the event that Bulgaria is using as part of its political and historical campaign over Macedonia.
Professor, how was the news received in Macedonia that Tsar Samuil is returning – or “coming home” – to Bulgaria
Well, he was never in Bulgaria; why would he be “coming home” when he was never taken from Bulgaria in the first place? The implication here is that we stole Samuil from Bulgaria and brought him to Macedonia, yet he was born in Macedonia, died here, and was buried here. I don’t know… what is this “news” about him returning to Bulgaria! It is utter nonsense.
Where is he buried?
Now, that is a question worthy of a Nobel Prize. One thing is certain: he is not where they think he is, and the remains Bulgaria is taking do not belong to Samuil. First of all, regarding those four graves there – no one knows whose they are; there is no inscription, no evidence whatsoever. Initially, it was said that the grave was inside the church, beneath the slab featuring Persian ornaments—leading to the theory that he was of Persian origin. Some claim he died and was buried in Prilep, while others maintain he was laid to rest in an entirely different location. The only Byzantine source is Michael Attaleiates, who states that Samuel died at the “Marshy Lake”—or rather, on the “Marshy Island.” But where was he buried? In my opinion, Samuil’s remains were taken to Bulgaria as early as 1943, following Italy’s capitulation in World War II—and given that Italian forces had previously held the Prespa region—Bulgarian troops entered the area. An archaeologist (I believe his surname was Filov) arrived, and they conducted an investigation in the village of German on Lake Prespa, where Samuil’s father, mother, and brother had been buried. Logically, this would have been the family tomb, suggesting Samuil was buried there as well. Bulgarian soldiers transported all the remains discovered in German—specifically around those churches—to Sofia back in 1943–44. Consequently, it is possible that the remains were taken to Bulgaria at that time. The remains currently being retrieved are, in all likelihood, not Samuil’s. The remains found in those graves most likely belong to one of the priests. Evidence of this lies in Moutsopoulos’s initial findings: the position of the skeleton—the way the deceased is laid out (I am not sure how closely your politicians and archaeologists have examined this)—shows him lying on his back with a “headrest” (as we call it) beneath his head; specifically, there are three bricks arranged in the shape of the letter “Pi” (Π)—two placed vertically and one horizontally across the top—and he rests upon that structure. This type of burial practice is found neither in Bulgaria nor in Macedonia. This indicates that the person buried there was not from this region. Who knows where he was brought from—perhaps he was a priest from Asia Minor or somewhere else entirely. Such a burial method does not exist in the Balkans.
Professor, the sarcophagus containing the remains of Tsar Samuel, brought from Greece, has been placed in the Church of St. Sophia, where it will be on display. Do you know what is inscribed on the sarcophagus? “Samuil, in Christ God, Tsar of the Bulgarians.”
That was written by someone else; Samuil certainly did not write it. There is not a single document or record in which Samuil refers to himself as “Tsar of the Bulgarians.” In fact, he never refers to himself as “Tsar” anywhere; instead, he uses the title “Servant of God”—meaning Samuel, the servant of God. He is not referred to as “Tsar.” Byzantine authors unanimously label him a renegade and a tyrant; nowhere do they acknowledge his title of Tsar. Only Skylitzes, when discussing the fall of Ohrid to Byzantine rule, happens to mention the discovery of imperial palaces and pearl-adorned crowns there, though he does not specify whether they were imperial crowns or ecclesiastical ones. That is all the information we have. After the Battle of Spercheios, Yahya of Antioch recounts that negotiations for peace took place between Basil II and Samuel, and that Samuel offered submission; however—and this comes from a completely different source, not Skylitzes—just as Basil II was considering accepting the offer, Samuel proclaimed himself Tsar. Furthermore, there is no record anywhere stating that he styled himself “Tsar of the Bulgarians” or of any other people. We refer to the state as Samuel’s Empire or Samuel’s realm, but the extent to which it was truly an empire is another matter. It was a conglomerate—as Božidar Prokić noted long ago—a sort of contemporary federation of local princes who united under Samuel’s rule in opposition to both Boris II and Byzantium. Skylitzes clearly testifies to this in his chronicle.
So, in your view, Samuil is not a Tsar—not a Macedonian Tsar?
We cannot call him Macedonian; as I told you, it is nowhere designated as Macedonian, Bulgarian, or anything else. If you look at the symbols on the monument in Sofia—the one you erected—it bears the 16-rayed sun of ancient Macedonia, the symbol of ancient Macedonia. It also features the lion on the front. Look at the monument in Sofia; you are the ones who placed it there. Those are the ancient symbols from ancient Macedonia.
The post Macedonian historian responds to Bulgarian claims about Tsar Samuil appeared first on Republika English.
Macedonian historian responds to Bulgarian claims about Tsar Samuil 2026
IUSTITIA.BG – Investigations 2009-2026 2026-10-04 20:15:52
Latest news World news Country news Most important news latest news most important latest of the day Justice Petar Nizamov Feathers Petar Nizamov- Feathers Justice bg iustitia.bg iustitia iusticia usticia investigation Burgas Bulgaria news news of the last hour news of the day news of today Bulgaria news The news from Bulgaria blitz news top news most important most commented latest news Boyko Borisov news weather coronavirus news news weather facebook youtube facebook instagram news today news of the last minutes news today today news news bg news leading news hot news bg news site for news all news news bg news of the last hour latest latest news bg news of today news today news today news of the last hour latest news today news bg news news 24 hours news vesti bg novini news world bird bg bivol bg bivol trud bg novini latest news today novinite bg news hello bulgaria political party coat of arms delyan peevski scandalous Bulgarian National Television Free Europe Television scandal exclusive live tv live right now tv tv online tv program bg live now tv news online tv online live court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas district court Burgas appellate court Burgas prosecutor Burgas prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Prosecutor General Ivan Geshev Prosecutor Geshev Tsatsarov Ministry of Internal Affairs Burgas ODMR Burgas ODPR Burgas police Burgas district police Burgas prosecutor Tsatsarov SGS cases Varna court chairman of the SGS court decisions on civil cases decisions on cases Plovdiv court decision of the court decisions cases Varna court criminal cases district district court decisions work in the court SGS chairman of the SGS judges Sofia court post judges Plovdiv court Plovdiv judges Plovdiv Supreme Court Inspectorate Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Council lawyer lawyer criminal cases lawyer civil cases lawyer marriage cases lawyer administrative criminal law criminal process civil law civil process administrative law constitutional law
