JOHANNESBURG (AP) — More than six decades after South African apartheid police opened fire on an unarmed crowd protesting pass laws in Sharpeville, a township south of Johannesburg, survivors and relatives of the victims announced on Thursday they would launch a class-action lawsuit against the government.
At a media briefing held in Sharpeville, lawyers said the case seeks compensation and asks a court to strike down the 1961 Indemnity Act, which they say prevented victims from pursuing claims arising from the massacre and remains in force today.
Police shot at an unarmed crowd protesting apartheid pass laws on March 21, 1960, and drew international condemnation. Apartheid-era police records put the toll at 69 dead and 180 injured, while research cited by the plaintiffs says at least 91 people were killed and more than 238 wounded.
The massacre became a defining moment in the struggle against apartheid, with March 21 now observed in South Africa as Human Rights Day, a public holiday.
Before Thursday’s announcement, family members of victims retraced the protesters’ route in a silent walk of witness.
Survivor lives with the trauma
Abram Mofokeng, 87, was 20 when he was shot in the foot and back as he fled the gunfire. A bullet remains lodged in his back.
“It is not possible to forget what happened in 1960,” Mofokeng said. “I cannot go a day without thinking about how we have been affected.”
Mofokeng is one of three Sharpeville residents acting as representative plaintiffs for a wider group in the case brought by Lawyers for Human Rights. The others, Paulina Mathinye and Ishmael Poho, both lost their fathers in the massacre when they were young children.
More than 70 survivors and relatives have expressed support for or interest in joining the litigation.
The government had not yet responded to queries by the time of publication.
Why victims could not sue
The fight for compensation is not new. In the aftermath of the massacre, around 258 claims were filed, but the government later enacted the Indemnity Act of 1961, shielding officials from legal liability and extinguishing the claims. Only about a third resulted in discretionary payments, totaling less than 4% of what claimants had sought.
The applicants want the legislation struck down, arguing that it violates their constitutional right of access to the courts. If they succeed, their claims for damages can proceed.
The lawyers did not give a total figure for the claim but said it would vary for each claimant and would be worked out with the help of experts.
They also said the case seeks to address gaps left by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission process, under which only 51 Sharpeville survivors were formally awarded reparations.
‘A time of reckoning for modern South Africa’
The Sharpeville litigation comes amid a broader push in South Africa to revisit apartheid era abuses, including reopened inquests into the deaths of anti-apartheid figures including Steve Biko, the Cradock Four and Chief Albert Luthuli.
Dan Leader, a partner at British human rights law firm Leigh Day, which is advising the South African legal team, called the case part of South Africa’s “unfinished business.”
“This is a time of reckoning for modern South Africa,” Leader said.
Charne Tracey, from Lawyers for Human Rights, said the plaintiffs hoped the case would push the government into talks with survivors and families over reparations.
“They are under no illusions that they must carry a legal stick if their voices are going to be listened to,” she said in a statement.
Poho said the case was about more than compensation, explaining that the effects of the massacre had been felt across the wider Sharpeville community.
“This is not a case for an individual as such,” he said. “It is a case for every other person who suffers an injustice.”
___
AP Africa news: https://apnews.com/hub/africa
Sharpeville massacre survivors file class action lawsuit in South Africa 2026
IUSTITIA.BG – Investigations 2009-2026 2026-09-03 15:05:41
Latest news World news Country news Most important news latest news most important latest of the day Justice Petar Nizamov Feathers Petar Nizamov- Feathers Justice bg iustitia.bg iustitia iusticia usticia investigation Burgas Bulgaria news news of the last hour news of the day news of today Bulgaria news The news from Bulgaria blitz news top news most important most commented latest news Boyko Borisov news weather coronavirus news news weather facebook youtube facebook instagram news today news of the last minutes news today today news news bg news leading news hot news bg news site for news all news news bg news of the last hour latest latest news bg news of today news today news today news of the last hour latest news today news bg news news 24 hours news vesti bg novini news world bird bg bivol bg bivol trud bg novini latest news today novinite bg news hello bulgaria political party coat of arms delyan peevski scandalous Bulgarian National Television Free Europe Television scandal exclusive live tv live right now tv tv online tv program bg live now tv news online tv online live court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas district court Burgas appellate court Burgas prosecutor Burgas prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Prosecutor General Ivan Geshev Prosecutor Geshev Tsatsarov Ministry of Internal Affairs Burgas ODMR Burgas ODPR Burgas police Burgas district police Burgas prosecutor Tsatsarov SGS cases Varna court chairman of the SGS court decisions on civil cases decisions on cases Plovdiv court decision of the court decisions cases Varna court criminal cases district district court decisions work in the court SGS chairman of the SGS judges Sofia court post judges Plovdiv court Plovdiv judges Plovdiv Supreme Court Inspectorate Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Council lawyer lawyer criminal cases lawyer civil cases lawyer marriage cases lawyer administrative criminal law criminal process civil law civil process administrative law constitutional law
